There are a multitude of small historical events and locations that are largely forgotten. One such is Fort Massachusetts, a wooden stockade built in 1745. What’s left is a small marker on a boulder, unnoticed and bypassed by all unless they specifically look for it. The marker itself, in the back of a parking lot, conveys little except that some type of fighting took place here. Nearby some small ruins remain from a 1930s reproduction.

Fort Massachusetts today
In 1745, Fort Massachusetts served as the westernmost outpost of New England. Strategically vital, but isolated on the frontier, its small, often sick garrison could barely control the wilderness beyond its walls. In August 1746, a force of nearly 900 French and Indian allies surrounded the fort; after a brief siege that left one defender dead and the rest captive.
The siege typified the brutality of frontier warfare and the vulnerability of colonial outposts. It also showed the fragility of English control beyond a few hundred yards away from their forts. Finally, the siege produced a rare firsthand description of captivity on the frontier.
Why Fort Massachusetts
English colonists built Fort Massachusetts at the outset of King George’s War, the third in the series of small wars between England and France in the New World during the late 15th and early to middle 16th centuries. King George’s War (1744-1748), King William’s War (1689-1687) and Queen Anne’s War (1703-1714) were proxy wars. Neither England nor France sent regular forces to fight them.
French militia and their Indian allies fought against English colonial militia and a small grouping of their Indian allies. Not until the start of the French and Indian War in 1755 did France and Britain send regulars to fight in North America.
Building the Fort
Lt. John Catin, Jr., supervised construction of Fort Massachusetts by militiamen for the Province of Massachusetts Bay. They built it on the banks of the Hoosic River in what is now North Adams, Mass. In its time, Fort Massachusetts had strategic importance as the westernmost fort in New England.

The Hoosic River
Essentially it sat isolated, with its nearest help more than 20 miles away at Deerfield, Mass. Back then, that distance posed a big problem because of the rough roads and trails that connected them. The fort’s isolation made it an inviting target for French forces and their Indian allies who continually raided the New England frontier.
In “A Brief History of Fort Massachusetts,” compiled by the Friends of Fort Massachusetts, the fort’s important location is described as at the crossroads of the famous Indian trail of the Five Nations and the old Mohawk warpath. High, rough quartzite rocks made it hard to outflank the fort from the north. The bending river made it hard to attack from the south. Low, swampy ground stretched to the west and northwest.
Native Americans, mostly hostile to the colonists, controlled the wilderness north and west of Fort Massachusetts.
Fort Massachusetts
The fort was a log stockade 120 feet long by 80 feet wide, with 12-foot-high walls, loop-holes, corner watch boxes and a central parade ground. Designed for a garrison of 40 to 50 men, it could mount swivel guns but not cannon. It had a commanding wilderness presence, but it was no match for a formal siege with artillery.
The men at Fort Massachusetts had two main functions. First, they patrolled the wilderness to give early warning of approaching danger. Second, they protected its sole supply line back to Deerfield.
A handful of full-time militiamen made up the garrison, never more than 50 and usually less. Local farmers mostly held down the fort part time. Sometimes, the family of some of the more permanent militia lived within the fort.
Illness plagued the fort until its fall, as many in the garrison often fell too ill to pull duty. It didn’t help that the fort bordered a swamp and a river. Nor did the poor sanitary practices of the day.
Capt. Ephraim Williams commanded Fort Massachusetts. Born on March 7, 1715, he belonged to one of the major influential families in Western Massachusetts, known as the “River Gods.” He would serve as a colonel in the French and Indian War and left his estate for the school now known as Williams College. But a cloud always hung over his head for what transpired at Fort Massachusetts that summer.

Ephraim Williams’ last will and testament
Skirmishes
On May 5, 1745, Sgt. John Hawks and John Miles (also called John Mighills) rode out on patrol from the fort still under construction. One source states they rode on the same horse.
After going a short distance, two Indians ambushed them, wounding both. The attackers knocked Hawks from the horse, and apparently his companion rode away. Hawks recovered enough to defend himself. As one version states, he “so scared the savages, that one jumped down the bank, and the other got behind a tree and called for quarter.” There is probably more of a sense of the white man’s superiority in this telling than there is actual truth. But Hawks did manage to escape back to the fort.
Then on May 25, 1745, Natives attacked a work party escort, but the colonists drove off the attackers. On June 11, 1745, Indians killed Elisha Nims while part of a work party near the fort. They also captured Benjamin Taintor, but supporting fire from the fort drove them off and he escaped.
The colonists could not hope to control the wilderness. The wilderness belonged to the Indians, all of whom were hostile, either as allies of the French, or because of past wrongs committed by the colonists. The best these scouting parties could hope for was early warning of a large attack on the fort.
The Rev. John Norton, one of the defenders, wrote a narrative of the events that followed. Entitled “The Redeemed Captive,” he stuck to the facts though he wrote poorly. Few people read it, and it was almost lost. But then it appeared in an 1870 history of the French and Indian War.
The Attack Begins
Aug. 18, 1746, started out as a routine day with no foreboding. Many in the garrison had the flux (dysentery). Capt. Ephraim Williams had left the area on business, leaving Sgt. John Hawks in command.
Unbeknownst to the colonists, the fort was effectively already surrounded. Two days earlier, Dr. Thomas Williams, Capt. Ephraim Willams’ brother, had left the fort with 20 men, half of them sick. They headed for Deerfield with a letter from Hawks, asking the captain for ammunition as they were very short of it. Hawks also said they had seen signs of the enemy. The French wisely let this party pass unmolested to avoid alerting the fort to their presence.
Capt. Ephraim Williams didn’t get the letter in time.
Meanwhile, Norton noted, on the day of the attack, 22 men, three women and five children were in the fort. Eleven men had gotten sick and almost everyone had the grippe and flux.
Then on August 19, the French and Indians attacked. Norton wrote that 22 men, three women and five children were all in the fort.
Continuing the story:
There appeared an army of French and Indians, eight or nine hundred in number, command by Monsieur Rigaud de Vaudreuil, who, having surrounded the fort on every side, began with hideous acclamations to rush forward upon the fort, firing incessantly upon us on every side.
The fort did not fall immediately—miraculously, given the surprise and the overwhelming number of attackers. Ironically, the sickness that afflicted the defenders saved them since it kept them confined to the fort that morning. Had they gone out in the open, the enemy would have quickly overwhelmed them.
The Fort Massachusetts Attackers
The French force commanded by Francois-Pierre Rigaud de Vaudreuil consisted of several regular officers, 18 militia officers, two chaplains, a surgeon, 400 French colonists and 300 Indians from the Ottawa, Sauteurs, Hurons and Potawatomy. The besiegers also included an uncertain number of men from a force led by Lieutenant Demuy.

Pierre de Rigaud, marquis de Vaudreuil-Cavagnial
Vaudreuil left Montreal on Aug. 3, 1746 and took 10 days to reach the vicinity of Fort Massachusetts.
But despite their overwhelming numbers, they wouldn’t have an easy time of capturing Fort Massachusetts. The well-built fort had protection from a river on one side and a swamp on another.
In addition, the French had no cannon or engineers to tunnel under the fort. Indians, though masters of wilderness warfare, had no training in attacking fortifications. They did know a direct attack would result in too many casualties to make it worthwhile. Their only realistic option was a siege. But it couldn’t last too long because the French, several hundred miles from home, had limited resources.
Initially, the French tried to rush Fort Massachusetts and overwhelm it by numbers and surprise.
Besieged
Norton described what happened next.
Mr. Hawks, our officer, ordered that we should let them come without firing at all at them, until they should approach with a suitable distance, that we might have a good prospect of doing execution. We suffered them to come up on a body till they were within twenty rods of us, and then we fired; upon which the enemy soon betook themselves to trees, stumps and logs, where they lay and fire incessantly upon us…”
Their surprise attack thwarted, the French settled into a siege. With their overwhelming advantage they had no need to risk more casualties for a foregone conclusion.
The closest help for the defenders was at Deerfield. But with the fort surrounded and every man sick, Hawks saw little hope in getting anyone through the cordon with a message.
The siege settled into a series of sniping attacks, each side firing on targets of opportunity. The French enjoyed the advantage of plenty of ammunition. In the fort, Norton points out:
Several of our men being newly come into service, and for want of bullet moulds, had not prepared for any long engagement, and therefore the sergeant ordered some of our sick men to make bullets, and other to run some shot, having shot-moulds This put him upon particular notice of the ammunition, and he found it be very short, and therefore gave orders that we should not fire any more than we thought necessary to hold the enemy back.
‘The Worst of Noises’
As night fell, the fort’s defenders observed activity in the French camp that they interpreted as the making of ladders for an assault. They quickly discovered that the French were preparing materials to burn out the defenders. Sergeant Hawks then took measures to fill every vessel that could hold water, He also had passages cut through walls from room to room to better defend the interior.
Around 8 or 9 p.m. in the dark, the French force closed in on the fort. John Hawks wrote in his journal:
That night they surrounded the fort & kept a shout, Indians & singers & all worsts of noises, until the morning & then as soon as that daylight they renewed their attack.
The fort’s defenders suffered just one fatality. On the last morning of the siege, Thomas Knowlton was shot in the head while manning a watchtower. Apparently, he remained alive for several hours but, bizarrely, was never removed from the watchtower. The Indians would mutilate his body after the fort surrendered.
At noon on the next day, the French called for a parley. Vaudreuil promised quarter if they surrendered, otherwise he would take the fort by force. He, of course, was only stating the obvious, but whether he would carry out the threat at that time was questionable.

A French-Canadian militiaman in 1759
Sergeant Hawks asked for two hours to decide. But he knew he had little choice. Norton states they only had three or four pounds of powder left, not much shot and only eight men mostly healthy. Nor could they leave the women and children at the mercy of the enemy during an attack they could not realistically resist for long.
Surrender of Fort Massachusetts
Hawks now sought the best terms he could – surrender to the French and not the Indians. He also asked to be in French custody, for the children to remain with their parents, and that they be allowed to be exchanged. Vaudreuil agreed to the terms, also promising “Christian care and charity.” He also let them leave notes for their families to inform them of their fate.
Norton then goes on to paint the picture of the surrender:
About three of the clock we admitted the General and a number of his officers to the fort. Upon which he set up his standard. The gate was not opened to the rest…After they had plundered the fort, they set it on fire, and led us out to their camp.
In the end, the French did not honor the terms that the prisoners should remain with them. Vaudreuil tried to get Hawks to agree willingly to go with the Indians, who in their turn wanted the honor of presenting the captives to the French authorities in New France. Hawks, however, refused. But Vaudreuil had to placate the Indians, and he turned the captives over to them. Fears of mistreatment were quickly quelled. The Indians took exceptional care of the captives, including all the sick, and never in any way mistreated them.
A New Fort
In 1747, reconstruction began on a new Fort Massachusetts, again under the command of Capt. Ephraim Williams. It essentially followed the plan of the original fort but with bigger watchtowers equipped with swivel guns. It never suffered another major attack but did repel a raid in 1748.
The fort was activated under the command of Captain Williams when the French and Indian War broke out. The British used it to stage incursions into the Mohawk Valley and as a ranger base.

Illustration of British soldiers marching into the Mohawk Valley. Created by Chat GPT.
With the end of the French and Indian War, the fort no longer served a purpose and gradually fell into disuse.
Efforts to preserve the site began in 1895 by the North Adams Women’s Club. That resulted in the construction of a replica fort in 1933 using existing plans of the original.
By the mid-1940s, it was no longer financially viable. After passing briefly into private hands, it was demolished in 1960 to become part of a supermarket parking lot. Today, fragments of the 1930 fort remain, along with a lonely plaque.
In 2017 the supermarket closed and donated 0.345 acres to the city of North Adams to create a park at the site of the fort.
John Hawks is the author’s 2nd Cousin, 9 times removed.
Images: By Marottawriter – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=51667913. Hoosic River By John Phelan – Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10717658. Ephraim Williams’ will By Devinh48 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64858968.Featured image created by ChatGPT.
In 1860, Abraham Lincoln sent a most curious message to Sen. Hannibal Hamlin of Maine. It was a letter of introduction. Lincoln, the Republican nominee for president, was reaching out to his running mate! In it Lincoln wrote, “It appears to me that you and I ought to be acquainted…” Hamlin had learned of his nomination just two months earlier.






































