Decades before the Cleveland Indians changed their name to the Guardians, fans named the team the Naps. They chose the name because of their star player, Nap Lajoie.
Nap Lejoie and the 1902 and 1910 batting titles that he won, or rather didn’t win but should have.
Nap Lajoie (short for Napoleon) was born in Woonsocket, R.I., in 1874 and started his major league career in Philadelphia. But he made his biggest mark playing second in base in Cleveland for the Naps.
Lajoie, nicknamed “The Frenchman,” was an undisputed first-ballot Hall-of-Famer. His career batting average was .338 (including a season over .400). He had 3,252 hits, earned the Triple Crown and managed 700 games, winning 377 of them. He also won five batting titles, but two (the only two in history) remain in dispute to this day.
Nap Lojoie Cheated of His Title
The dispute over the 1902 batting title boils down to numbers and lawsuits. In 1901, Lajoie jumped from the Philadelphia Phillies of the National League to the Philadelphia Athletics of the upstart American League. He did it for a 130 percent raise in pay, to $6,000 a year.
Nap Lajoie in 1913
In 1902, the Phillies retaliated and sued the Athletics and Lajoie. The Phillies won a court order that barred him from playing. The order was only valid in Pennsylvania, however. So the Athletics traded Lajoie to Cleveland, where he could play (so long as he did not pass through Pennsylvania).
Under the rules in place at the time, Lajoie’s 352 at-bats made him eligible for the batting title, which he won with a .378 batting average. The Hall of Fame statisticians, however, disqualify Lajoie from the race. Because of his start in Philadelphia and the inability to play games in Pennsylvania, Lajoie didn’t make enough plate appearances to qualify under modern rules. Those rules require 442 plate appearances.
The Hall of Fame gives the award to Washington Senator Ed Delahanty, who hit .376. (Delahanty would die the next year, swept over Niagara Falls.)
A Chalmer automobile
Lajoie vs. Cobb
Lajoie’s final batting title, in 1910, was even more contentious. Chalmers Automobile in 1910 offered a free car as a prize to the winner of the batting title. That increased public awareness of the stats race tremendously. Lajoie was neck and neck with Ty Cobb in the race. Cobb, a notorious self-promoter and stats chaser, was widely loathed by his fellow players. Lajoie was the opposite.
The 1910 batting title came down to the final game of the season. Cobb, playing for Detroit, sat out the final two games of the season, protecting his average at .385. Lajoie, meanwhile, finished the season on a tear, going eight for eight in a doubleheader at St. Louis.
After the final game, however, it became clear there had been a conspiracy to take the title away from the much-hated Cobb. The St. Louis manager had ordered his third baseman to play back in left field, allowing Lajoie to bunt at will. And a St. Louis coach had offered a bribe to an umpire to change a throwing error to a hit in order to boost Lajoie’s average.
Ty Cobb (left) and Nap Lajoie
Lajoie ended the season at .384. The fallout resulted in the league president banning the St. Louis manager, and the title went to Cobb.
In 1978, however, the tireless writers for the Sporting News uncovered yet another taint to the race. In compiling the stats for the year, Detroit had been credited with one game twice. That meant Cobb received credit for two hits more than he had actually earned. His correct batting average was .383, giving the legitimate title back to Lajoie.
There’s little doubt the league knew of the error at the time, as the official statistician had revised the stats for all the Detroit players except Cobb. Better to simply let both men have cars, and both Lajoie and Cobb did receive new Chalmers. Thus the company got far more bang for its publicity buck than it expected.
This story updated in 2022.
80 comments
Did he hit with a split grip like Cobb?
Yes, supposedly he had bats with two knobs. One at the end and the other midway up the grip.
[…] 1909 he was back in Cleveland with the Naps, named after Woonsocket, R.I., native Napoleon Lajoie. His final year, 1911, was split between the Naps and the Boston Rustlers (now the Atlanta […]
[…] had merged, and Cleveland’s American League team was known as the Naps, after their best player, Nap Lajoie. But Lajoie had been traded, and the team needed a new name. In 1915, the team’s owner asked […]
[…] churches, Catholic hospitals and sports heroes like Springfield’s Leo Durocher and Woonsocket’s Nap LaJoie. They’ve produced writers like Annie Proulx, who comes from Norwich, Conn., and chefs like Emeril […]
[…] Ced plastered the walls with baseball memorabilia and photographs of his favorite players: Nap Lajoie, Jimmy Collins, Cy Young, Chick Stahl and Buck Freeman. The Third Base attracted politicians, […]
[…] Ced plastered the walls with baseball memorabilia and photographs of his favorite players: Nap Lajoie, Jimmy Collins, Cy Young, Chick Stahl and Buck Freeman. The Third Base attracted politicians, […]
[…] has won batting titles in both leagues, technically, one player in major league history did … or did he? Ed Delahanty won the 1899 NL batting title with a .410 average for the Philadelphia Phillies, and […]
[…] Ced plastered the walls with baseball memorabilia and photographs of his favorite players: Nap Lajoie, Jimmy Collins, Cy Young, Chick Stahl and Buck Freeman. The Third Base attracted politicians, […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers contemplate Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a totally different […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers take into account Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a unique normal on […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. However some researchers contemplate Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a distinct normal on the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the US League winner in 1902 for the mark of .376 with Washington Senators. But Some researchers Nap Lajoie was considered the winner in 1902 with an average of 0.378 due to a different criterion […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers contemplate Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a unique commonplace on […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers think about Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a totally different […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. However some researchers take into account Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a distinct normal on […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] and the 1902 American League winner for his mark of .376 with the Senators of Washington too. But some researchers Think of Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with an average of 0.378, as at that time a different […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. However some researchers think about Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a special normal on the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. However some researchers take into account Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a special […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. However some researchers contemplate Nap Lajoie because the 1902 winner with a .378 common due to a unique normal on the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
[…] Phillies and the American League winner in 1902 for his .376 mark with the Washington Senators. But some researchers consider Nap Lajoie as the 1902 winner with a .378 average because of a different standard at the […]
Comments are closed.