As the Puritans set about eking out their survival in Massachusetts in the early 1600s, they naturally had to conquer some major problems: managing to obtain food, fighting their enemies for land and, of course, creating a Puritan dress code.
The Puritans took the issue of dress very seriously. In England, the king and court set the styles, and Charles I adopted a very showy look. Slashed sleeves topped the list as the height of fashion. They allowed the wearer to show rich layers of fabric underneath the top layer of clothing.
Fashionistas, 17th-C Style
Fashionistas in Charles’ court wore boots with broad, showy circles of leather. Silk ribbons adorned fashionable toes.
Both men and women wore enormous showpieces on their heads, also known as hats. And broad lace collars and cuffs topped off the stylish outfit, often adorning fabrics laced with silk, gold and silver.
The whole ensemble was designed to both flatter the figure and show the wealth of the wearer.
Such ostentation was anathema to the Puritans. Though the Puritans didn’t always dress in black – they did wear many colors – they found the wasteful and unseemly clothing of England’s high society immodest.
One Slash
In 1634, the General Court in Plymouth decried “the great, superfluous and unnecessary expenses occasioned by reason of some new and immodest fashions, as also the ordinary wearing of silver, gold and silk laces, girdles, hatbands, etc. ”
Plymouth’s General Court banned lace and silver and gold thread. Further, it decreed: ‘No person either man or woman shall make or buy any slashed clothes, other than one slash in each sleeve and another in the back.
Also forbidden or worn under penalty:
…all cut-works, embroidered or needle work, caps, bands and rails.
Puritan Dress Code Revisited
The General Court again revisited the Puritan dress code in 1651. By then it softened its attitude toward silver and gold thread — at least for the rich and powerful. For others, not so much. People were supposed to dress according to their station.
The Plymouth General Court declared its “utter detestation and dislike’ that men or women of ‘mean condition, educations and callings should take upon them the garb of gentlemen.” The Court forbade the poorer folk to wear gold and silver lace, buttons or points at their knees. Ordinary men couldn’t walk in great boots, and women of the same rank couldn’t wear silk or tiffany hoods or scarves.
Persons “of greater estate or more liberal education,” on the other hand, had much greater freedom of dress. You could wear silk hoods and scarves, silver and gold lace and bright buttons if you had the rank of magistrate, military officer, high official or wealthy person with more than £200. Others who wore these items would be fined.
And the punishments weren’t just confined to Plymouth. Throughout Massachusetts and Connecticut, court records show punishments handed out for overdress.
In his book, Ipswich in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, Thomas Franklin Waters found cases of women charged with “wearing excess apparel.” The court at Ipswich required them to prove their worth amounted to at least £200. No Puritan wanted to find himself in court, unable to pass the test.
The Puritans hauled others into court for wearing silver lace, silk hoods and silk scarves. Some defendants somehow avoided punishment for violating the Puritan dress code, while others had to pay fines of 10 shillings.
Demise of the Dress Code
By the 1680s, however, the Puritan dress code lost ground as wealth grew in the colonies. English fashions also exerted an even stronger pull on men and women.
Wigs and fancy dress still outraged the Puritan leaders. But their influence was waning. By then the courts generally stayed out of the question of clothing, and people wore the clothing they liked best.
***
New from the New England Historical Society. Click here to order your copy today.
You may also be interested in this story about Puritan punishments here. This story about the Puritan dress code was updated in 2025.
18 comments
[…] of Independence.” The New England Historical Society published a post called, “The Puritan Dress Code and the Outrage of Slashed Sleeves.” The New York Times covered an exhibition called “Hail Specimen of Female Art! New […]
[…] Outside the church, the tithingmen also were responsible for making sure children were being properly schooled in the Bible and that people in the taverns weren’t getting too drunk. Most towns had several tithingmen to keep an eye on things, as the Puritans were sticklers for rules. […]
[…] pardoned, since pardons for criminals who repented were not uncommon, despite the strictness of the Puritan laws. But not this […]
[…] the rich. Ostentation in clothing didn’t cut it for the wealthy either, as pronouncements against slashed sleeves—showy styles designed to flaunt the fine fabrics underneath—attested. The rich were not […]
[…] more prosperity and fewer wars to occupy their time, some Puritans were beginning to question the harsh lifestyle the Puritans […]
[…] from a description of a runaway slave who wore a Saxon blue jacket with bright green baize lining, slash sleeves and small metal buttons, a brown sleeveless jacket and scarlet […]
[…] shuffleboard was not that unusual considering the Puritan’s general orientation and the nature of the game in Britain. Dating back at least 500 years, […]
[…] Additionally, the cobwebbed hose, silver buttons, and hood worn by the model might have violated several ruling from the Massachusetts General Court regarding the less wealthy wearing clothing that was too ostentatious – you had to prove you […]
[…] decided the punishment for adultery was death (though the death penalty was rare). They banned fancy clothing, living with Indians and smoking in […]
[…] New England Historical Society, City College of New […]
[…] New England Historical Society, City College of New […]
[…] showiness and expense offended Puritan leaders, and several efforts limited the practices. In 1741, the Massachusetts government ruled it would […]
[…] not only typing and stenography, but English, speech and manners. She strictly enforced the dress code. Katharine Gibbs advertised in the local social register, Harper’s Bazaar and women’s college […]
[…] Puritans decided to punish adultery with death (though the death penalty was rare). They banned fancy clothing, living with Indians and smoking in […]
[…] They believed every person had a proper station in the hierarchy, and instilled a rigid dress code to indicate one’s social […]
[…] General Court passed a strict dress code prohibiting such fashion excesses as slashed sleeves, periwigs and bared bosoms. The law authorized […]
[…] within a purity spiral defined Puritan society. Dress became simple. Luxury was forbidden. Christmas was cancelled. And discipline became a social watchword. Marriage […]
[…] within a purity spiral defined Puritan society. Dress became simple. Luxury was forbidden. Christmas was cancelled. And discipline became a social watchword. Marriage […]
Comments are closed.