On every December 16th, it’s hard not to turn your mind back to the year 1773 when the most famous protest of the American Revolution took place in Boston Harbor – the destruction of the tea.
While often portrayed as a simple tax protest, the Massachusetts colonists dumped 342 chests of tea into the harbor because of a complicated set of events. They involved the grand British East India Company.
In 1773, the East India Company faced a dire situation. The expense of suppressing the people in its far-flung holdings bedeviled the company. A recent famine in India also drove up costs. And sales fell because of economic stagnation and failing trade in Europe.
In exchange for support from the British government, the East India Company had to to ship all of its tea to England. There, traders could buy it and export it to America and other places.
The Tea Tax
Unfortunately for the traders, this created a problem. The taxes on the tea that came in and out of England made the price uncompetitive with the Dutch. The result: a bustling trade in smuggled Dutch tea into America.
No one took the trouble to stamp out the illegal trade during good times. But when the East India Company had too much tea and too much debt, lobbyists and the politicians in England’s Parliament came up with what probably seemed like a good idea at the time: Allow the East India Company to take its tea directly to America.
That would bypass English taxes (and middlemen). Customs agents in America could collect a lighter tax on the tea.
What could be simpler? America would get its tea. The price, even with the tax, would be cheaper than the illegal Dutch tea. The East India Company could increase its share of the market while driving the Dutch out.
And as part of the bargain, the cheap tea would presumably force the Americans to accept the notion that they were, in fact, subject to British taxes. That would open up a revenue stream for the Crown, which the colonists had balked at.
But the idea proved toxic to the colonists. Not only did they oppose British taxation in principle, a good many were prospering from trade with the Dutch and other nations. The British government’s attempts to carve out a tea monopoly for its preferred corporate partner, the East India Company, would hurt the independent American merchants.
Additionally, once the British established the principle for tea, how long before other commodities would be similarly treated, forcing the colonists to pay out to a single corporate master for all their needs?
The idea did not sit well. The protests continued throughout the colonies. In Massachusetts, the royal governor decided to take a stand. Thomas Hutchinson declared the tea would be landed and taxed. Period. Or, not, as it turned out …
Faced with the ultimatum, the colonists conducted their now-famous raid on the ships Dartmouth, Eleanor and Beaver. The whole debacle left Hutchinson’s reputation in tatters. While he retained the loyalty of the Crown, most people viewed him as incompetent. Hutchinson would protest that he faced a Hobson’s Choice. He could use military force to land the tea, for which he would have been criticized, or he could let the tea return to England, for which he also would have been criticized.
More moderate Americans tried to mend fences with England, offering to pay for the tea. But the actions so infuriated the English politicians and aristocrats that no offers of apologies or payments were enough. The two sides moved closer to war.
This story was updated in 2017.
I am just starting to read “Bunker Hill” by Nathaniel Philbrick….he explains the Tea Party event very well….I certainly have learned lots of history from his wonderful historical books!
No more taxes!
No more government-corporate backed monopolies! Read the article.
Besides, NO taxes? Really?
[…] of Liberty and, through the Gazette, agitated against the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts and the tea tax. On Dec. 16, 1773, he hosted a still-unknown group of men before they set out for the […]
[…] Edes who, with John Gill, printed the radical newspaper Boston Gazette and instigated the Boston Tea Party. His father managed to escape the Siege of Boston and settle in Watertown, Mass, where he […]
[…] than tea smuggled in from Dutch traders. When the East India Company ran into financial trouble, Parliament gave it a special deal. The company was allowed to keep its monopoly and export tea directly to America without paying the […]
[…] Peter Edes was born Dec. 17, 1756 in Boston and trained from a young age in the patriotism of the American Revolution. John Hancock, John Adams and Joseph Warren congregated in his father's office. On the day before his 17th birthday, he refilled the china punch bowl several times for them as they dressed as Indians to throw tea into Boston Harbor. […]
[…] itself wasn’t a protest against taxes. It was a protest against a corporate tax break – to the East India Company. The giant corporation was near financial collapse, though it had an abundance of unsold tea. […]
[…] called the Pine Tree Riot. An early test of British royal authority, it may have encouraged the Boston Tea Party a year and a half […]
Comments are closed.